MUSCLE CAR REVIEW MAGAZINE

1 of 2 people (50%) found the following review helpful:

• • Ad Relevance
  • Content Quality
  • Design Quality
  • Photo Quality
• • Ad-Free
    
    Ad-Heavy
  • Kid-Friendly
    
    For Adults
  • Short & Sweet
    
    Long & In-Depth
  • Sensational
    
    Authoritative

• Pros: Pictures
• Cons: GM biased

The research personnel need to be more informed and not take what the owners of the cars SAY or provide. Case in point Shelby Cougar never happened. In the Full House ACES article please no four door cars are muscle.

• Gender: Male
• Age: 35-54
• Parent: Yes
• Magazines: 4-5

4 of 6 people (67%) found the following review helpful:

• • Ad Relevance
  • Content Quality
  • Design Quality
  • Photo Quality
• • Ad-Free
    
    Ad-Heavy
  • Kid-Friendly
    
    For Adults

• Pros: Accurate info, quality photos
• Cons: strong GM BIAS/ Very Unbalanced Content

Muscle Car Review magazine has a very strong early model GM bias. If you're a Chevy fan this is the magazine for you. Everybody else, forget it. Magazines like this and Hot Rod and a few others need to come with a warning label- or change their name to something more GM specific.

• Gender: Male
• Age: 35-54
• Parent: Yes
• Magazines: 4-5

8 of 16 people (50%) found the following review helpful:

• • Content Quality
  • Design Quality
  • Photo Quality

I love Muscle Car Review magazine. I saw one magazine and was hooked. I now save them in a binder as the information is timeless!